Cases 1 - 10 of 98
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01500
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01500
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
E.M., by his guardian and next friend, Madeline Grochowski et al v. Brown et al
as 7:2024cv00288
Defendant:
Robin Brown, Robin Freeman and Crystal Brake
Plaintiff:
E.M., by his guardian and next friend, Madeline Grochowski, K.M., by her guardian and next friend, Madeline Grochowski, H.M., by her guardian and next friend, Madeline Grochowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nia Lucas v. VHC Health
as 24-1128
Plaintiff:
NIA LUCAS and A.M., II, a minor, by and though his Guardian ad Litem, Nia Lucas
Defendant:
VHC HEALTH, d/b/a Virginia Hospital Center and VHC PHYSICIAN GROUP, LLC, d/b/a VHC Health Physician/OBGYN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1854
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Felicia Morgan v. City of Charlotte
as 23-1748
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FELICIA MORGAN, individually and as Guardian ad Litem of other Bobby Morgan
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CHARLOTTE, EDWARD GONZALEZ, both individually and in his official capacity as a law enforcement officer with CMPD, DEREK RUD, both individually and in his official capacity as a law enforcement officer with CMPD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
