Cases 1 - 10 of 301
Moore v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company et al
as 1:2024cv01600
Plaintiff:
Jacquelyn Moore
Defendant:
USAA Casualty Insurance Company, Deputy Jesse Patterson, Deputy Unknown Sheriff Deputy One and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
FREEMAN et al v. SANCHEZ et al
as 1:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY FREEMAN and C. B.
Defendant:
MARBELY SANCHEZ, GREGORY J. SEABOLT and CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ashley Casanova v. Joe Biden
as 24-1235
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY CASANOVA
Defendant:
PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN, FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, NORTH CAROLINA and others
Paul Shao v. Allstate Insurance Company
as 24-1204
Plaintiff:
PAUL SHAO
Defendant:
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
Paul Shao v. Allstate Insurance Company
as 24-1190
Plaintiff:
PAUL SHAO
Defendant:
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disability Act
Guess v. Coble as Richland County et al
as 3:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Thurmond Guess, Sr.
Defendant:
Daniel Coble as Richland County, Circuit Court, Morgan Stuart Stout and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00909
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jones v. Thornton, et al
as 7:2023cv01676
Plaintiff:
Mr. Antonio Trey Jones and Antonio Trey Jones
Defendant:
Mr. James Haywood Thornton, Mr. William T Brady, Andrew Worley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
