Cases 1 - 10 of 472
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00333
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1416
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Albero et al v. Worcester County Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2024cv01100
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Albero and Kevin Arthur
Defendant:
Worcester County Board of Commissioners, Sergeant Timothy Mulligan, Naomi Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Richard Kowalewitch v. City of Virginia Beach
as 24-1309
Plaintiff:
RICHARD KOWALEWITCH and DONALD EDWARDS
Defendant:
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA BEACH CITY COUNCIL, ROBERT DYER, In their official capacity as members of Virginia Beach City Council and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dan Chacko v. Melissa Preston
as 24-1243
Plaintiff:
DAN CHACKO
Defendant:
MELISSA PRESTON, DAVID POWELL, JOHN R. FORD and others
Taras Raggio v. Chris Davis
as 24-1214
Plaintiff:
TARAS N. RAGGIO, PHD
Defendant:
SHERIFF CHRIS DAVIS, Pamlico County Sheriffs Office, SHERIFF ALFRED CHIP HUGHES, Craven County Sheriffs Office, SHERIFF ENNIS WRIGHT, Cumberland County Sheriffs Office and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Ciccaglione v. Nathan Associates, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
Bryce Ciccaglione
Defendant:
Nathan Associates, Inc., Jennifer Feinleib, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
