Cases 1 - 10 of 597
Vaughn et al v. Jack L. Marcus Inc
as 1:2024cv01776
Plaintiff:
Donald D Vaughn, Paul Martin and Charles Tucker
Defendant:
Jack L. Marcus Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hensley v. Teets, et al
as 1:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Catherine Hensley, as Administratrix of the Estate of Christopher Hensley,
Defendant:
Michael R Teets, Michael G Elizondo, Seth D Summey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. SAP/SAPNS2
as 1:2024cv00882
Plaintiff:
Folake Martin
Defendant:
SAP/SAPNS2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Emiabata v. O'Malley et al
as 1:2024cv01196
Plaintiff:
Philip Emiabata
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Charles and Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
EFIRD v. ROCKINGHAM COUNTY SHERIFF SAMUEL SCOTT PAGE et al
as 1:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
Kyle, Estate of Kepley and MELISSA EFIRD
Defendant:
Rockingham County Sheriff Samuel Scott Page, Southern Health Partners, Inc., M.D. ELTON J. AMOS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Raymond May, Jr. v. Martin Fein Interest Ltd.
as 24-1323
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND EARL MAY, JR. and ANGELA DOLORES MAY
Defendant:
MARTIN FEIN INTEREST LTD.
Hensley et al v. Wellpath, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Robert Hensley and Robin Hensley
Defendant:
Wellpath, LLC, Sarah Eves, P.A., Christopher Adkins, R.N. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01020
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
