Cases 1 - 10 of 160
Sage Mills Residential, LTD. v. Aiken County, South Carolina et al
as 1:2024cv02733
Plaintiff:
Sage Mills Residential, LTD.
Defendant:
Aiken County, South Carolina and South Carolina Department of Transportation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mills v. National Crime Information Center et al
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Mills
Defendant:
National Crime Information Center and Criminal Justice Information Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Mendoza v. Beaufort County School District et al
as 9:2024cv02332
Plaintiff:
Roberto Mendoza
Defendant:
Beaufort County School District, Ryan Milling, Joseph Hollington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Disability Definition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01235
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00513
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00679
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
