Cases 1 - 10 of 87
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv05299
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Brown et al v. The City of Lynchburg et al
as 6:2024cv00039
Defendant:
The City of Lynchburg, Virginia State Trooper John Roe, LPD Officers John Does 1-20 and others
Plaintiff:
Stanley Lee Brown, Jr. and Da'Quan Hunt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1669
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Roe v. Fowlkes Tucker, et al.
as 3:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Jane Roe
Defendant:
Tykeshae Fowlkes Tucker and Nkemdilim Okoli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Warren v. Schachter et al
as 3:2023cv00624
Plaintiff:
Richard Eugene Warren
Defendant:
Esq. Annette Schachter, Robertson, Anschutz, Schneld, Carne & Partners, PLLC, Stephanie Chudy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Doe v. Leonard et al
as 3:2023cv00485
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
Karl S. Leonard, Ted Knight, John Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01617
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Mazyck v. City of North Charleston et al
as 2:2023cv02602
Plaintiff:
Joseph Mazyck
Defendant:
City of North Charleston, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1341
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
