Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Gogel, et al v. Smith, et al
as 3:2022cv00239
Plaintiff:
Gilbrith Gogel, Puranjyot Chaggar, Ashanti Holland and others
Defendant:
William Smith, Antoinette V. Irving, E. M. Konopka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mattison v. Willis, et al
as 4:2021cv00087
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Eliot Mattison
Defendant:
Janie Deborah Willis, Sherry Ann Zamora, Timothy Martin O'Boyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stith v. Hennings Jr., et al
as 1:2020cv00946
Defendant:
Shaun David Rutherford, Sabra Elayne Mastalski and Williams J Jennings
Plaintiff:
Tiana Stith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stith v. Sussex County Jail
as 1:2019cv00272
Petitioner:
Abdual Stith
Defendant:
Sussex County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Mattison v. Willis et al
as 4:2017cv00134
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Eliot Mattison
Defendant:
Janie Deborah Willis, Sherry Ann Zamora, Timothy Martin O'Boyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mattison v. Willis et al
as 4:2017cv00100
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Eliot Mattison
Defendant:
Janie Deborah Willis, Sherry Ann Zamora, Timothy Martin O'Boyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dayyan Atta Bey ex rel v. C. Call
as 15-1845
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAYYAN ATTA BEY EX REL DERICK SEALEY
Defendant - Appellee:
C. CALL, badge #534 individual, Policeman (Public Servant), K. BRADFORD, Corporal, Policeman Supervisor (Public Servant), ALBERT PATRICK, individual, Judge (Public Servant) and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
