Cases 1 - 10 of 260
Raymond v. CVS Health
as 1:2024cv02246
Plaintiff:
Tony Raymond
Defendant:
CVS Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cr Fed. Question: Civil Rights (Race Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
THAXTON v. CASWELL COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE et al
as 1:2024cv00533
Defendant:
TONY DURDEN, JR., OTIS FOSTER, KEN MITCHELL and others
Plaintiff:
TYLAN DELSHAUN THAXTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THAXTON v. CASWELL COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE et al
as 1:2024cv00534
Defendant:
SHERIFF TONY DURDEN, JR., JOHN DOE CORPORATION, KEN MITCHELL and others
Plaintiff:
TALAISHA DAYSHAUN THAXTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
BRITT v. CASWELL COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE et al
as 1:2024cv00535
Defendant:
JOHN DOE CORPORATION, SHERIFF TONY DURDEN, JR., KEN MITCHELL and others
Plaintiff:
LA TOYE ANN BRITT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Knowles
as 6:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Tony Lee Brown
Defendant:
Brian Knowles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01411
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Tony Forrester v. Officer Kemp
as 24-1276
Plaintiff:
TONY GENE FORRESTER
Defendant:
OFFICER KEMP, VICTORIA ANN LATHAM and ANDREA MITCHELL
Tati King v. Glenn Youngkin
as 24-1265
Plaintiff:
TATI ABU KING, TONI HEATH JOHNSON and BRIDGING THE GAP IN VIRGINIA
Defendant:
GLENN YOUNGKIN, in his official capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia, KELLY GEE, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Commonwealth of Virginia, JOHN O'BANNON, in his official capacity as Chairman of the State Board of Elections for the Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
