Cases 11 - 20 of 50
Pledger v. Lynch et al
as 5:2016ct03253
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo M. Pledger
Defendant:
Loretta Lynch, Charles Samuels, Jr., J.F. Caraway and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Lytle v. Samuels et al
as 5:2016cv02277
Plaintiff:
Curtis Jerome Lytle
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, Jr, Christopher Zych, Curtis Mabe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Sacaranto et al
as 5:2016hc02135
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
A. Sacaranto, J. Walker, A. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lytle v. Samuels et al
as 5:2016cv01784
Plaintiff:
Curtis Jerome Lytle
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, Jr, Christopher Zych, Curtis Mabe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marino et al v. Saad et al
as 5:2016cv00061
Plaintiff:
Vincent Michael Marino and Juan Carlos Ortiz-Abreu
Defendant:
Jennifer Saad, Mr. Kelly, Mr. Squires and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Marino et al v. Saad et al
as 5:2016cv00061
Petitioner:
Vincent Michael Marino and Juan Carlos Ortiz-Abreu
Respondent:
Jennifer Saad, Mr. Kelly, Mr. Squires and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bailey v. Obama et al
as 3:2016cv00223
Plaintiff:
Brent Scott Bailey
Defendant:
Barak Obama, Loretta Lynch, Attorney General, Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Logan v. United States of America et al
as 5:2016ct03086
Plaintiff:
Joe A. Logan
Defendant:
United States of America, Charles Samuel, Jr., Warden Cross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Matherly v. J.F. Andrew
as 16-6473
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS SHANE MATHERLY
Defendant - Appellee:
J.F. ANDREWS, DEBORAH A. GONZALES, CANDICE GREGORY and others
Brown v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 2:2016cv00017
Plaintiff:
Roderick Brown
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, Sally Quillian Yates, Charles Samuels and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
