Cases 11 - 20 of 713
Crowder et al v. Burress et al
as 1:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Crowder and Diane L. Crowder
Defendant:
Kimberly Burress, Bethany Herman, Gregory Moss, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. USA
as 7:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
Darion Graham
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Godbee v. Graham
as 2:2024cv00702
Petitioner:
Burnett Godbee
Respondent:
Warden Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Graham v. Artrip et al
as 7:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Tommy James Graham, Jr.
Defendant:
J. Artrip, Thompson, Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lester v. Ojo et al
as 5:2023ct03363
Plaintiff:
Andre Eugene Lester
Defendant:
A. Odu, N. Harris, J. Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacques v. Staff Members at U.S.P. Lee et al
as 7:2023cv00769
Plaintiff:
Patrick Jacques
Defendant:
Staff Members at U.S.P. Lee, A.W. Waughan, Lt. D. Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Meyers v. Reidinger et al
as 3:2023cv00812
Defendant:
David Meyers, Martin Reidinger, Graham Mullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tito Knox v. Officer Graham
as 23-7177
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TITO LEMONT KNOX
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER GRAHAM, JOE BIDEN, S. RICE and others
L.M. et al v. Graham et al
as 1:2023cv01574
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Defendant:
Jonathan Graham, Michelle Smith, John Doe #4 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fleischer v. Hoskins et al
as 5:2023cv00335
Plaintiff:
Daniel Fleischer
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Hoskins, Correctional Nurse Raymond Graham and John Does 1-11
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
