Cases 11 - 20 of 91
Toby McDuffie, Jr. v. Wade
as 23-6411
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TOBY M. MCDUFFIE, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. WADE, CHENEQUA MCNEILL and CAPTAIN THOMPSON
James McNeill v. Monica Bond
as 23-6181
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES C. MCNEILL
Defendant / Appellee:
MONICA BOND
Defendant:
CAMERON GADDY, NICOLAS BUSTILLOS, VIGO and others
MCNEILL v. U.S. MARSHALS
as 1:2022cv01044
Plaintiff:
EDDIE LAVON MCNEILL
Defendant:
U.S. MARSHALS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emilien v. McNeill et al
as 6:2022cv03326
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Emilien
Defendant:
Chelsea B. McNeill and Matthew R. Ozment
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
MCNEILL v. USA
as 1:2022cv00642
Petitioner:
EDDIE LAVON MCNEILL
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
McNeill v. Ramos et al
as 5:2022hc02134
Petitioner:
Demetrios Donell McNeill
Respondent:
Warden R. Ramos and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McNeill v. USA
as 5:2022cv00191
Petitioner:
Shawn Antonio McNeill
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Reaves v. Davidson et al
as 4:2022cv01142
Plaintiff:
Kathy J. Reaves and Kathy Juanita Reaves
Defendant:
William H. Davidson, II, Davidson, Wren & DeMasters, P.A., South Carolina Div. of Motor Vehicles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reaves v. Wilkerson et al
as 4:2022cv01077
Plaintiff:
Kathy Reaves and Kathy Juanita Reaves
Defendant:
Scott Wilkerson, Regina Crolley, Mark Keel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James McNeill v. Michael Hinson
as 22-6266
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES C. MCNEILL
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL D. HINSON, f/k/a Hinson, BRETT SIMMONS, Correctional Lieutenant, WILLIAM HORNE, Correctional Housing Unit Manager and others
Defendant:
JOHN HERRING, Correctional Superintendent
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
