Cases 11 - 20 of 224
Charlie Hardin v. Elizabeth Peake
as 23-6308
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLIE L. HARDIN
Defendant / Appellee:
MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH JOI PEAKE, KATY POOLE, SUPERINTENDENT OF SCOTLAND, OFFICER WILEY and others
Poole v. Gordon
as 6:2023cv01214
Plaintiff:
Leo Vincent Poole
Defendant:
J Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Brown v. Corizon Health et al
as 1:2023cv00788
Plaintiff:
Alfred Brown
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Paul Matera, Ruth Cambell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
James McNeill v. Monica Bond
as 23-6181
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES C. MCNEILL
Defendant / Appellee:
MONICA BOND
Defendant:
CAMERON GADDY, NICOLAS BUSTILLOS, VIGO and others
MUSGROVE v. ISHEE et al
as 1:2022cv01125
Plaintiff:
SAQUAN S. MUSGROVE
Defendant:
TODD ISHEE, KATE POOLE, DEAN LOCKLEAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crump v. Carver et al
as 3:2022cv00541
Plaintiff:
Ramar Dion Benjamin Crump
Defendant:
Ben Carver, Saint T. Tapp, David E. Cothron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdu-Salim Gould v. Todd Ishee
as 22-7084
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABDU-SALIM GOULD, a/k/a Salim Abdu Gould, a/k/a Salimabdu Gould
Defendant / Appellee:
TODD E. ISHEE, KENNETH E. LASSITER, EDDIE THOMAS and others
Abdu-Salim Gould v. Todd Ishee
as 22-7066
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABDU-SALIM GOULD, a/k/a Salim Abdu Gould, a/k/a Salimabdu Gould
Defendant / Appellee:
TODD E. ISHEE, KENNETH E. LASSITER, EDDIE THOMAS and others
Poole v. Nines et al
as 1:2022cv02234
Petitioner:
Eric Poole
Respondent:
Jeff Nines and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Poole v. Roderick et al
as 1:2022cv02233
Plaintiff:
Eric Poole and Eric Von Poole
Defendant:
R. Roderick, Paul Wheeler, WCI's ARP Coordinator and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
