Cases 11 - 20 of 560
Bright v. Wood
as 3:2024cv00173
Petitioner:
Rickey Bright
Respondent:
Chris Wood, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Graham v. Artrip et al
as 7:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Tommy James Graham, Jr.
Defendant:
J. Artrip, Thompson, Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Frick et al
as 7:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Kevin Allen Robinson
Defendant:
Sgt. Frick, Issac Wood, Patrick Co. Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson, Jr. v. Woods et al
as 9:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
John E. Wilson, Jr.
Defendant:
Lieutenant Ms. Woods, Melissa Eambrell and Melissa Gambrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garcia v. SCDPS et al
as 3:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Jerome Garcia
Defendant:
SCDPS, Trooper Wayne Davidson, South Carolina Public Safety and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Wood v. Clarke et al.
as 1:2023cv01809
Plaintiff:
James R. Wood
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Steve Herrick, J.D. Oates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richison v. Chapman et al
as 2:2023cv00771
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Richison
Defendant:
CO Aaron Chapman, CO Joel Hammer, CO Ashley Husk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wood v. Clarke et al
as 2:2023cv00644
Plaintiff:
James R. Wood
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Mark Amonette, MD, Mr. Dillon, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Langdon
as 9:2023cv06377
Petitioner:
Cedric L. Woods
Defendant:
William Langdon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wood v. FCI Gilmer
as 5:2023cv00339
Petitioner:
Wesley Wood
Respondent:
Warden FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
