Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Angelo K. Williams v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-7440
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANGELO KARON WILLIAMS, sui juris, Freeman
Respondent - Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., his official capacity as: Attorney General for United States, REX WAYNE COFFEY, In his official capacity as: Sheriff for Charles County Maryland, ROD J. ROSENSTEIN, In his official capacity as: Attorney for United States Court and others
Stewart v. Calhoun et al
as 9:2013cv01891
Plaintiff:
Morris Fitzgerald Stewart, Jr
Defendant:
T Calhoun, M Reilley, Laurel Albertin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv00252
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Coffey v. USA
as 5:2012cv00154
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Alan Lee Coffey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00845
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Noris Hudson v. FNU Evan
as 10-7234
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NORIS EUGENE HUDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
FNU EVANS, Nurse, FNU COFFEY, Nurse and FNU NICHOLS, Screening Officer
Hudson v. Evans et al
as 5:2010cv00100
Plaintiff:
Noris Eugene Hudson
Defendant:
FNU Evans, FNU Coffey and FNU Nichols
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. Evans et al
as 5:2010cv00087
Plaintiff:
Noris Eugene Hudson
Defendant:
Nurse Evans, FNU Coffey and Mr. Nichols
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. Evans et al
as 5:2010ct03106
Plaintiff:
Noris Eugene Hudson
Defendant:
Nurse Evans, Nurse Coffey and Mr. Nichols
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clenney v. Coffey
as 8:2010cv01314
Plaintiff:
David T. Clenney
Defendant:
Rex W. Coffey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
