Cases 21 - 30 of 4,389
Mills v. Scalf et al
as 7:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
William Matthias Mills
Defendant:
Officer S. Scalf, Officer Geldenhuys, Officer B. Akers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hubbard v. Duffield Jail et al
as 7:2024cv00276
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Hubbard
Defendant:
Duffield Jail, Nurse B. Carroll and R.N.P. Audia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larry Blakney v. Merrick Garland
as 24-6377
Petitioner:
LARRY BLAKNEY
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of U.S. and WARDEN THOMAS SCARANTINO
Terrence Hammock v. Zowie Barnes
as 24-6375
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE EDWARD HAMMOCK, JR.
Defendant:
DR. ZOWIE BARNES, M.D., DIRECTOR GAIL WATTS, OFFICER J. SHERMAN and others
Moumouni v. Chester County Sheriff's Department
as 1:2024cv02167
Plaintiff:
Rose Moumouni and Rose B. Moumouni
Defendant:
Chester County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Cooper v. Mullen et al
as 7:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant:
B. Mullen and WRSP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. Lampman et al
as 1:2024cv00602
Plaintiff:
Tremaine Porter
Defendant:
P. Lampman, Joshua Branch and B. Springs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
El-Bey v. Schiffer et al
as 1:2024cv01036
Plaintiff:
Bro Stephen Michael El-Bey
Defendant:
Jenniffer B Schiffer, John Addison Howard, Roberl Brisco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. State of South Carolina
as 4:2024cv01753
Petitioner:
Charles B. Moore, Jr.
Respondent:
State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Steele v. North Carolina Department of Adult Correction et al
as 5:2024ct03081
Plaintiff:
Colell B. Steele and Colell Barion Steele
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Adult Correction, Todd Ishee, Peter Buchholtz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
