Cases 21 - 30 of 364
Ford v. Lovett
as 3:2023cv00155
Petitioner:
Samuel B. Ford
Respondent:
S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ford v. Lovett
as 3:2023cv00137
Petitioner:
Samuel B. Ford
Respondent:
S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Donald Derrick v. Bobby Thomas
as 23-6514
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD E. DERRICK
Defendant / Appellee:
BOBBY THOMAS, LT. CHRISTOPHER HUNT, Chief Investigator Police Services, A/W KENNETH SHARP, Kershaw C.I. Associate Warden over Programs and others
Raymond Ford, Jr. v. Ralph Northam
as 23-6410
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND ALEXANDER FORD, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH NORTHAM, Governor of Virginia (Former), GLENN YOUNGKIN, Governor of Virginia (Present), HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections (VDOC) and others
Ford v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00081
Petitioner:
Jimmy Lee Ford, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ford v. Lovett et al
as 3:2023cv00038
Petitioner:
Shadeasha Ford
Respondent:
Lovett and Rae
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Emile v. Clarke et al
as 1:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
Maurice Emile
Defendant:
H.W. Clarke, L.T. Edmons, K.T. Punturi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Ford v. SFF Hazelton et al
as 5:2023cv00015
Petitioner:
Shadeasha Ford
Respondent:
SFF Hazelton, Warden Lovette, Warden Rae and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
FORD v. USA
as 1:2023cv00070
Petitioner:
JIMMY LEE FORD, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Shelton v. Ford
as 7:2022cv00698
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Shelton
Defendant:
Amanda C. Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
