Cases 21 - 30 of 367
McMann v. Greene et al
as 5:2023ct03164
Plaintiff:
Neal McMann
Defendant:
Wakenda Greene, Mrs. Martinez, Stephen Eddings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal v. Greensville Correctional Center
as 1:2023cv00696
Petitioner:
Dai'Shawn Marquis Neal
Respondent:
Greensville Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Neal v. Clarke
as 1:2023cv00448
Petitioner:
Daishawn Neal and Hamza Abjullaah Nassir Neal
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NEAL v. ANDERSON
as 1:2023cv00285
Petitioner:
GLENN WHICKER NEAL, JR.
Respondent:
BEN ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charlie Hardin v. Elizabeth Peake
as 23-6308
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLIE L. HARDIN
Defendant / Appellee:
MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH JOI PEAKE, KATY POOLE, SUPERINTENDENT OF SCOTLAND, OFFICER WILEY and others
NEAL v. ANDERSON
as 1:2023cv00284
Petitioner:
GLENN WHICKER NEAL, JR.
Respondent:
BEN ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MEYERS v. GERNEGEN et al
as 1:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
MS. VALRUS GERNEGEN, MR. MARCUS SCOTT, CAPTAIN MR. INGRAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lamont v. Clyde
as 2:2023cv01148
Plaintiff:
Neals Kelsey Lamont
Defendant:
Lean L Clyde and Leon Clyde L.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Butler v. Davenport et al
as 5:2022ct03447
Plaintiff:
Jasheem Shamar Butler
Defendant:
Russell Davenport, Sergeant Shiflett, Jason Cleary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. GERNEGEN et al
as 1:2022cv01067
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
MS. BALRUS PERRIGAN GERNEGEN, MARCUS SCOTT, CAPTAIN MR. INGRAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
