Cases 21 - 30 of 569
Saunders v. Aramark workers et al
as 3:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Quantel Omek Saunders
Defendant:
Aramark workers, Aramark supervisors, Capt. Hinchman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Gillens v. Michael Carvajal
as 24-6227
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BRUCE GILLENS
Defendant:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL, BOP Director, DOE #1, unknown mail staff/supervisor, KENNETH CRADDOCK, Discipline Hearing Officer and others
Marqueion Harrison v. Warden Bullard
as 24-6128
Plaintiff:
MARQUEION HARRISON
Defendant:
WARDEN BULLARD, STEPHEN JACOBS, SERGEANT LEGGETT and others
Kenneth Newkirk v. K. Fleming
as 24-6063
Plaintiff:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT K. M. FLEMING, HAROLD C. CLARKE, Director, Dept. of Corrections, CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Dept. of Corrections and others
Robinson v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Ra'Quan Robinson
Defendant:
Warden David Anderson, A.W. Bateman, C.O. Lyons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walter Beasley v. T. Peyton
as 24-6047
Plaintiff:
MR. WALTER RAY BEASLEY
Defendant:
MRS. T. PEYTON, Kitchen Supervisor, MR. LARRY LEABOUGH, Head Superintendent, MR. MARK CULVER, Lieutenant and others
Weaver v. Lauren et al
as 7:2023cv00824
Plaintiff:
Ras Warren Edward Weaver
Defendant:
Head Nurse Lauren, Sargent Steven Smith, Corpral Zackory Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Small v. Matvsiewicz et al
as 1:2023cv06413
Plaintiff:
Edwin Evandar Small, Jr., Jugg, Van and others
Defendant:
Lt. Matvsiewicz, Cpl Gee, Sgt Chris Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Jai King v. A. Boyd
as 23-7200
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAI ALQUAN KING
Defendant / Appellee:
AMANDA BOYD, HSA Supervisor, DR. DALE MORENO, LIEUTENANT MONTRELL BEASLEY and others
Tyler v. Coe
as 9:2023cv06102
Plaintiff:
Larry James Tyler
Defendant:
Waddell Coe and Medical Dept. Supervisor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
