Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 11,827
JAMES v. WARDEN
as 5:2024cv00079
Petitioner: Calvin James
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Smart v. Hawkins et al
as 5:2024ct03100
Plaintiff: Michael Trevor Smart
Defendant: S. Hawkins, Associate Warden Bennett, Sergeant Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. South Carolina We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv02599
Petitioner: Raekwon D.A. Wilson
Respondent: South Carolina and Warden McCormick Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gary Boone v. Michael Carvajal
as 24-6588
Plaintiff: GARY DEAN BOONE, also known as Valerie Boone
Defendant: MICHAEL CARVAJAL, A. MENDOZA, Warden FCI Williamsburg individually and in official capacity, S. HOEY, Medical Provider Williamsburg FCI individually and in official capacity and others
Todd Giffen v. Warden FMC Rochester
as 24-6590
Petitioner: TODD MICHAEL GIFFEN
Respondent: WARDEN FMC ROCHESTER
Campos v. Jackson
as 8:2024cv03510
Petitioner: Filiberto Campos
Respondent: Warden Shane Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yakubu v. Joseph
as 5:2024cv02633
Petitioner: Nuru Yakubu
Respondent: Warden Joseph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lewis v. Warden Nance
as 8:2024cv02266
Petitioner: Justin Jamal Lewis and Justin Jamal Lewis,
Respondent: Warden Nance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Lovett et al
as 3:2024cv00047
Plaintiff: William C. Brown
Defendant: Warden Lovett and Dr. Gregory Mimms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hayes v. Warden
as 1:2024cv01720
Plaintiff: Latonya Hayes
Defendant: Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?