Cases 31 - 40 of 383
Banks v. Darden
as 1:2022cv03137
Petitioner:
Lamont Banks, Jr.
Respondent:
Debora Darden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sampson v. Garst et al
as 7:2022cv00638
Plaintiff:
Robert Sampson
Defendant:
Marsha Garsht, Deena Reed, Harrisonburg Social Services Fraud Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. B.C.D.C. et al
as 1:2022cv02569
Plaintiff:
Anthony Kaishawn Banks
Defendant:
B.C.D.C. and Walabai
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. King
as 5:2022hc02164
Petitioner:
Tawoine Banks
Respondent:
Warden M.L. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Banks v. Mueller et al
as 1:2022cv03003
Plaintiff:
Arnold Ray Banks and Arnold R. Banks, Jr.
Defendant:
Steve Mueller, Jane Doe, Nurse Lydia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Banks v. USP Lee
as 7:2022cv00516
Petitioner:
Johnnie Edwards Banks, Jr.
Respondent:
USP Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BANKS v. ROGERS et al
as 1:2022cv00602
Petitioner:
MITCHELL DANYELL BANKS
Respondent:
DANNY ROGERS, D.W. COOKE, W.M. EVANS and others
Defendant:
TRAVELERS CASUALTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cue v. Branch Banking and Trust
as 3:2022cv02340
Plaintiff:
Ebony Cue
Defendant:
Branch Banking and Trust doing business as Truist Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Banks v. Guistwite et al
as 8:2022cv01707
Plaintiff:
Anthony Banks
Defendant:
Kevin P. Guistwite and Brian Frost
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BANKS v. ROGERS et al
as 1:2022cv00452
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL DANYELL BANKS
Defendant:
SHERIFF DANNY ROGERS, SERGEANT D. W. COOKE, OFFICER W. M. EVANS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
