Cases 31 - 40 of 67
Johnson v. Dovey et al
as 8:2017cv00269
Petitioner:
Earl D. Johnson
Respondent:
Richard Dovey and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland Brian E Frosh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Jones et al
as 8:2017cv00025
Plaintiff:
Earl D. Johnson
Defendant:
Judith Jones and Collateral Review Division
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. McFadden
as 8:2016cv03552
Petitioner:
Terrance D Johnson
Respondent:
Joseph McFadden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Charles Birdsong v. Henry Ponton
as 16-7437
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES A. BIRDSONG
Defendant - Appellee:
HENRY J. PONTON, Warden, Nottoway Correctional Center, sued individually and in official capacity, D. JOHNSON, Correction Officer, Hearing Officer, Nottoway Correctional Center, sued individually and in official capacity, A. JAMES, Grievance Coordinator, Nottoway Correctional Center, sued individually and in official capacity and others
Johnson v. NC Department of Public Safety/Division of Prisons
as 1:2016cv00267
Plaintiff:
Wiley D. Johnson
Defendant:
NC Department of Public Safety/Division of Prisons
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson Jr. v. Sipes et al
as 8:2016cv02088
Plaintiff:
Earl D. Johnson Jr.
Defendant:
David Sipes and Amanda Duvall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Gayflor et al
as 8:2016cv00944
Plaintiff:
Earl D. Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Morley Gayflor and DPSCS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Dovey et al
as 8:2016cv00874
Petitioner:
Earl D. Johnson, Jr.
Respondent:
Richard Dovey and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Mill et al
as 8:2016cv00871
Plaintiff:
Earl D. Johnson
Defendant:
Ronald Mill, Richard Sartin, DPSCS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Dovey et al
as 8:2016cv00873
Petitioner:
Earl D. Johnson
Respondent:
Richard Dovey and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
