Cases 31 - 40 of 8,096
Henderson v. Donnelly, et al.
as 3:2024cv00581
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe, Patrick Donnelly, Jeffrey Snoddy and others
Plaintiff:
Sheila Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amar v. PSIMED Corrections, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00425
Defendant:
John/Jane Does, PrimeCare Medical, Inc., PSIMED Corrections, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Amar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Tibbs et al
as 5:2024cv00159
Defendant:
Lt. Timothy Tibbs and John/Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
Joseph Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Murphy et al
as 1:2024cv01450
Defendant:
Ashley Murphy, John Lucy and Brent Wright
Plaintiff:
Akeem C. Mason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fishbourne v. Murdaugh et al
as 3:2024cv04472
Defendant:
State of S.C., 14th Circuit Solicitors Office, Geroge C James and others
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Fishbourne and Ricardo Fishburne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Dane v. Bayless
as 5:2024cv00157
Petitioner:
John Dane
Respondent:
Melissa Bayless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
John Anthony Williams v. Alonzo Thompson
as 24-6769
Defendant:
UNKNOWN NAMED AGENTS OF GBI, Georgia Bureau Investigation, SHERIFF CHUCK WRIGHT, UNKNOWN NAME AGENTS OF SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES PHONE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN ANTHONY MICHAEL WILLIAMS
Shouse v. Caudill et al
as 7:2024cv00520
Defendant:
Caudill, Caudwell and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Jacob Alan Shouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson v. Bayliss
as 5:2024cv00154
Respondent:
Melissa Bayliss
Petitioner:
John Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Warren v. BOP Warden Ms. Ray et al
as 3:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Lamont Warren and Lamont Lee Warren
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, BOP Warden Ms. Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
