Cases 31 - 40 of 60
Winston v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 3:2017cv00405
Petitioner:
Monte DeCarlos Winston
Respondent:
U.S. Attorney General, Federal Bureau of Prisons and J. Andrews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00560
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morrow v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 5:2016hc02092
Petitioner:
Michael Keith Morrow
Respondent:
U.S. Attorney General and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Chris Murray v. Loretta Lynch
as 16-6585
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER I. MURRAY
Respondent - Appellee:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, U.S. Attorney General, IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, - (ICE) and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv00686
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Searcy v. Eastern District of North Carolina et al
as 5:2015ct03190
Plaintiff:
Edgar Searcy
Defendant:
Eastern District of North Carolina, U.S. Attorney General, U.S. Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Searcy v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 5:2015hc02126
Petitioner:
Edgar Searcy
Respondent:
U.S. Attorney General and United States Attorney for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Enrique Gomez v. Russell Perdue
as 14-7464
Petitioner - Appellant:
ENRIQUE GOMEZ-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
RUSSELL A. PERDUE, Warden of FCI Gilmer
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U.S. Attorney General, DIRECTOR OF HOMELAND SECURITY, DIRECTOR OF BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Abbadessa v. Perdue et al
as 3:2014cv00088
Defendant:
Peter Abbadessa
Respondent:
Russell A. Perdue and U.S. Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
