Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Peter Burkins v. USPS
as 10-7391
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER BURKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, US Post Office, JOHN DOE, Supervisor Customer Service and UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
Burkins v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2010cv00953
Plaintiff:
Peter Burkins
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and UPS/John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mayes v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2009cv00635
Plaintiff:
Norman L. Mayes
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Antonio Burts v. Greenville Clerk of Court
as 08-7247
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO BURTS
Defendant - Appellee:
GREENVILLE CLERK OF COURT, SOLICITORS OFFICE, 13th Judicial Circuit, DOROTHY A. MANIGAULT, Attorney and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00820
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Antonio Burts v. Greenville Clerk of Court
as 08-6243
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO BURTS
Defendant - Appellee:
GREENVILLE CLERK OF COURT, SOLICITORS OFFICE, 13th Judicial Circuit, DOROTHY A. MANIGAULT, Attorney and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-1158
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Burts v. Greenville Clerk of Court et al
as 8:2007cv03011
Plaintiff:
Antonio Burts
Defendant:
Greenville Clerk of Court, Solicitors Office, Dorothy A Manigault and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Johnson v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2007cv00403
Plaintiff:
David S. Johnson
Defendant:
State of Maryland, Robert L. Ehrlich, Jr., Robert M. Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
