Cases 41 - 50 of 5,762
David James, Jr. v. Roanoke City Sheriff's Office
as 24-6479
Plaintiff:
DAVID RANDALL JAMES, JR.
Defendant:
ROANOKE CITY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Johnson v. Lt. Chandler et al
as 0:2024cv03070
Plaintiff:
David Tyran Johnson
Defendant:
Lt. Chandler, Sgt. Calex, SCDC Security Threat Group Intelligence Task Force and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Little v. McDaniel
as 0:2024cv03044
Plaintiff:
David Antonio Little, Jr
Defendant:
Eric McDaniel and Florence County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Ryricka Custis v. David Anderson
as 24-6464
Petitioner:
RYRICKA NIKITA CUSTIS
Respondent:
DAVID ANDERSON
Eldridge v. Antonelli
as 5:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
David Eldridge
Defendant:
Bryan M. Antonelli, Unknown Mims, Unknown McNear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Strickland et al
as 3:2024cv00468
Petitioner:
Thaddeaus Jones
Respondent:
David Strickland and Baniecia Craig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brandon Crosby v. Larry Collins
as 24-6441
Plaintiff:
BRANDON LUIS CROSBY
Defendant:
LARRY COLLINS, Unit Manager of C-Building, DAVID ROBINSON, Chief of Correctional Operations for Virginia Department of Corrections, RANDALL MATHENA, Director of Security and Correction Enforcement for Virginia Department of Corrections and others
David McLester v. Lindsey DeGuehery
as 24-6446
Plaintiff:
DAVID MARTIN MCLESTER
Defendant:
DR. LINDSEY DEGUEHERY and NURSE R. JONES
Schneider v. Scruggs et al
as 1:2024cv01324
Plaintiff:
Elliott R. Schneider
Defendant:
Carolyn J. Scruggs, J. Phillip Morgan, William Bohrer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
David Little, Jr. v. Marcia Marine
as 24-6430
Plaintiff:
DAVID ANTONIO LITTLE, JR.
Defendant:
MARCIA MARINE, Sergeant, DAVID BROWN, Sheriff Deputy, CODY DIXON, Sheriff Deputy and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
