Cases 41 - 50 of 349
Henderson v. Wake County Sheriff's Office
as 5:2022ct03198
Plaintiff:
David Henderson
Defendant:
Wake County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. WellPath LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00490
Plaintiff:
Kevin Henderson, Jr.
Defendant:
WellPath LLC, Dr. Cane and Dr. Tarasova
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. Jackson et al
as 5:2022ct03131
Plaintiff:
Jarred Javon Ford
Defendant:
Denise Jackson, Dr. Wilson, Dr. Modinat Adeleye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malik et al v. Parker et al
as 3:2022cv00118
Plaintiff:
Yaya Bilal, Talib LNU, Nafis Akeem Alim Abdullah Malik and others
Defendant:
FNU Parker, FNU LNU, FNU Maddox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Henderson
as 1:2022cv00273
Plaintiff:
Justin T. Anderson
Defendant:
D Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Skinner et al
as 5:2022cv00012
Defendant:
Officer Pitt, Vernon Byrd, R. Skinner and others
Plaintiff:
Wallace Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Henderson v. USA
as 4:2022cv00006
Petitioner:
Davon Terrell Henderson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Terrance Henderson v. J. Harmon
as 22-6029
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRANCE ROBERT HENDERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
J. A. HARMON, Hearings Officer, Nottoway Correctional Center, CARL MANIS, Warden, Wallens State Prison and KAREN STAPLETON
Defendant:
W. R. HENSLEY, Hearings Officer, Wallens Ridge State Prison, DAVID ZOOK, Warden, Sussex I State Prison, T. LEABOUGH and others
Henderson v. USA
as 5:2022cv00006
Petitioner:
Latrel Henderson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Mobley v. Hoots et al
as 1:2021cv00364
Plaintiff:
Damon Mandell Mobley
Defendant:
Justin Hoots and Henderson County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
