Cases 41 - 50 of 68
Chris Murray v. Loretta Lynch
as 16-6585
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER I. MURRAY
Respondent - Appellee:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, U.S. Attorney General, IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, - (ICE) and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
NGUYEN v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2016cv00202
Plaintiff:
TU TUAN NGUYEN
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, CITY OF GREENSBORO, COUNTY OF GUILFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv03332
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Akeem Abdullah-Malik v. Bruce Bryant
as 15-6540
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AKEEM ALIN-NAFIS ABDULLAH-MALIK
Defendant - Appellee:
BRUCE M. BRYANT, et al Sheriff, JAMES F. ARWOOD, et al Jail Administrator, RICHARD L. MARTIN, JR., et al Assistant Jail Administrator and others
Akeem Abdullah-Malik v. Bruce Bryant
as 15-6002
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AKEEM ALIN-NAFIS ABDULLAH-MALIK
Defendant - Appellee:
BRUCE M. BRYANT, et al Sheriff, JAMES F. ARWOOD, et al Jail Administrator, RICHARD L. MARTIN, JR., et al Assistant Jail Administrator and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv03865
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv03472
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hutton v. State of West Virginia
as 1:2013cv00186
Petitioner:
Orville M. Hutton
Respondent:
State of West Virginia , Patrick Morrissey, Joseph Shaffer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01490
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ice v. Hartness et al
as 2:2012cv00037
Plaintiff:
Thomas Craig Ice
Defendant:
Tyler Hartness, Latte, D. McBrayer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
