Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Leake v. USA
as 4:2013cv01471
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Kartarie Sahndal Prince Leake
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
LEAK v. USA
as 1:2012cv00615
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
RODNEY EUGENE LEAK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Leak v. USA
as 3:2012cv00148
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Talvin Leak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Leak v. USA
as 3:2009cv00079
Petitioner:
Lorenzo Leak, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Edward Jefferson v. Kathleen Green
as 09-6821
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD W. JEFFERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN S. GREEN, Warden, OFFICER LOWE, LIEUTENANT LEAK and others
Jonathan Riches
as 08-7883
Appellant:
In re: JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH W. DEAN, ALFRED FREIMARK, HOMER MARSHALL and others
Defendant:
LARRY LEAKE, in his official capacity as Chairman of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, GENEVIEVE C. SIMS, in her official capacity as a Member of the State Board of Elections, ROBERT B. CORDLE, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections and others
Intervenor/Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES OF THE NAACP
Joseph Leaks v. Pamunkey Regional Jail
as 08-7826
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH LEAKS
Defendant - Appellee:
PAMUNKEY REGIONAL JAIL, JOHN DOE, Captain of Security and JOHN DOE, Classification Officers
Leaks v. Pamunkey Regional Jail et al
as 1:2008cv00881
Petitioner:
Joseph Leaks
Respondent:
Pamunkey Regional Jail, J.C. Willett, Cleveau and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Leaks v. Pamunkey Regional Jail et al
as 1:2008cv00724
Plaintiff:
Joseph Leaks
Defendant:
Pamunkey Regional Jail, John Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
US v. Johnson
as 07-7294
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
COLEMAN LEAKE JOHNSON, JR.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
