Cases 41 - 50 of 70
Littlejohn v. Ozmint et al
as 1:2010cv02332
Plaintiff:
Tron Manuel Littlejohn
Defendant:
Jon Ozmint, Dennis Patterson, Jimmy Sligh, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Amason et al
as 2:2010cv02085
Plaintiff:
John James Bell
Defendant:
Cathrine A Amason , Kamisha Miller , Pamela Hough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Amason et al
as 8:2010cv02085
Plaintiff:
John James Bell
Defendant:
Cathrine A Amason, Mischa Michael, Janice Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harvey Short v. J. Walls, II
as 10-6873
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARVEY P. SHORT
Defendant - Appellee:
J. D. WALLS, II, JASON HALL, Officer, LINDSAY DONAHOE, Officer and others
Defendant:
SOUTH CENTRAL REGIONAL JAIL
Umberger v. McKay
as 2:2010cv00364
Petitioner:
Chris Umberger
Respondent:
John C. McKay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bell v. Cooke et al
as 8:2010cv00398
Plaintiff:
John James Bell
Defendant:
Doris Ann Cooke, M Beinor, P Hough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Stephney v. Ozmint et al
as 1:2009cv02898
Plaintiff:
Wade Stephney, Jr
Defendant:
John Ozmint , M Beinor , S Blake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephney v. Ozmint et al
as 8:2009cv02898
Plaintiff:
Wade Stephney, Jr
Defendant:
John Ozmint, M Beinor, S Blake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Miller v. SC Dept of Corrections et al
as 2:2009cv02407
Plaintiff:
John Alan Miller
Defendant:
SC Dept of Corrections, Cecilia Reynolds, NFN McKay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Arthur v. Walls et al
as 2:2009cv00807
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Brandon Arthur
Defendant:
Gerald Walls, Ashe and John McKay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.