Cases 41 - 50 of 522
Meyers v. Honeycutt et al
as 5:2023cv00181
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
R. Honeycutt, Amy Jenkins, Daniel Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Angotti v. Harris et al
as 3:2023cv00730
Plaintiff:
Louis Angotti
Defendant:
A. Harris, Mark Amonett, C. Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Day et al
as 1:2023cv02962
Plaintiff:
Maurice Albert Johnson
Defendant:
Magistrate Judge Charles B. Day, Judge Peter J. Messitte, John Chamble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Clifton Batts v. Richard Myers, II
as 23-7058
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLIFTON WILLIAM BATTS
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD E. MYERS, II, SHERRI HORNER LAWRENCE and PETER A. MOORE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02845
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02799
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Harper v. Garland et al
as 5:2023hc02224
Petitioner:
Terek Harper
Respondent:
Merrick Garland and Colette Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00311
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Bakha Yawuti El v. City of Myrtle Beach
as 23-2003
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BAKHA YAWUTI EL
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF MYRTLE BEACH, CITY OF MYRTLE BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT, DAVID GIOSA and others
Ortiz-Vargas v. Brown et al
as 5:2023cv00306
Petitioner:
Efrain Ortiz-Vargas
Respondent:
Warden Brown and Director of BOP C. Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
