Cases 41 - 50 of 761
Gause v. Isha et al
as 3:2023cv00382
Petitioner:
Walter T. Gause
Respondent:
Todd Isha, Peter Bucholtz, FNU Rodgers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Beasley v. T. Peyton, et al.
as 1:2023cv00782
Plaintiff:
Walter Ray Beasley
Defendant:
T. Peyton, Larry Leabough, Mark Culver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Walter Jackson v. Tutrell
as 23-6568
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALTER JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
TUTRELL, Deputy Sheriff and FRAZER, Deputy Sheriff
Sanders v. Joseph
as 5:2023cv02332
Petitioner:
Walter G Sanders, Jr
Respondent:
Warden M Joseph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Charles Asmer v. Ms. Walton-Battle
as 23-6443
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES ANTHONY ASMER
Defendant / Appellee:
MS. WALTON-BATTLE, H. LOPEZ and WALTER VEREEN
Defendant:
REX BLOCKER, STEPHEN SIZEMORE, KRISTEN ELDRED and others
David Meyers v. Harold Clarke
as 23-6407
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, VDOC Director, U.S. DISTRICT COURT ROANOKE DIVISION, ELIZABETH KAY DILLON, U.S. Judge and others
David Meyers v. Walter Swiney
as 23-6402
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
WALTER SWINEY, Unit Manager, D. C. STALLARD and M. L. COUNTS
Defendant:
U. S. POSTAL SERVICE, J. GIBSON, P. SYLKES and others
GAUSE v. GEOFF et al
as 1:2023cv00350
Plaintiff:
WALTER T. GAUSE
Defendant:
GREGORY GEOFF, FNU - SHAW, MORRISON LEACH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. Yancey, MD, et al.
as 1:2023cv00462
Plaintiff:
James R. Wood
Defendant:
Eric Yancey, MD, Tammy Williams, J.D. Oats, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poor v. Beasley, et al.
as 3:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
Tristan Anthony Poor
Defendant:
Monique Beasley, Walter Beasley, Melinda Hosley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
