Cases 51 - 60 of 135,098
Shaheed v. USA - 2255
as 1:2024cv01869
Petitioner:
Khalil Shaheed
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Berrios v. State of Maryland
as 1:2024cv01755
Petitioner:
Osbaldo Lemus Berrios
Respondent:
State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Horne v. USA
as 1:2024cv01871
Plaintiff:
Gregory J. Horne
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Stitely v. John's Hopkins Otolaryngology et al
as 1:2024cv01872
Plaintiff:
David Stitely
Defendant:
John's Hopkins Otolaryngology and Alenezi Abdulrahman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BOLEY v. FISHER et al
as 1:2024cv00532
Plaintiff:
ELDMOND BOLEY
Defendant:
FISHER, ROWAN COUNTY DETENTION CENTER and LIEUTENANT DEBLASI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Falero v. Virginia Department of Corrections
as 1:2024cv01115
Plaintiff:
Damian F.S. Falero
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Marshall et al
as 1:2024cv01116
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Young
Defendant:
Capt. Marshall, Capt. Harris, Chaplain Hollerman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collick v. Willey
as 1:2024cv01874
Plaintiff:
Riley Lee Collick
Defendant:
Connor Willey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Joseph I. Patterson, III
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Heather Ray and FBOP Director Collette Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Nicholas v. Fairmont State Police et al
as 5:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
James Nicholas
Defendant:
Fairmont State Police and Steven Fitz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
