Cases 51 - 60 of 72
Adrian Smith v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-6309
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADRIAN MARION SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States of America, STATE OF GEORGIA CIRCUIT JUDGE ANNIS and BILL BYARS, State of South Carolina SCDC Director
Barrie v. Lucero et al
as 1:2011cv01410
Petitioner:
Abdulai Barrie
Respondent:
Enrique Lucero , David L. Simons, John T. Morton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Vance v. Holder et al
as 6:2011cv03460
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lee Vance
Defendant:
Eric H Holder, Jr, Harold Lappin, John Does 1-50 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrew Wolters v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-7588
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANDREW WOLTERS
Respondent - Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U.S. Attorney General and WARDEN ZYCH, Prison Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-7038
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Craig Pasicov v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-6968
Petitioner - Appellee:
CRAIG JOHN PASICOV, a/k/a John Craig Pasicov
Respondent - Appellant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., JANET NAPOLITANO and JOHN T. MORTON
Heyer et al v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2011ct03118
Plaintiff:
Thomas Heyer and Robert Paul Boyd
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons, Thomas R. Kane, Ike Eichenlaub and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Kamal Patel v. Janet Napolitano
as 11-6386
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAMAL PATEL, a/k/a Kamalbhai Kanti Patel
Defendant - Appellee:
JANET NAPOLITANO, JONATHAN R. SCHARFEN, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv00572
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-7648
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.