Cases 51 - 60 of 706
Gethers v. Clarke et al
as 1:2023cv00426
Plaintiff:
Jamal Gethers
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, David Robinson, Leslie Fleming and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. State of South Carolina
as 6:2023cv01170
Petitioner:
Gene Tony Cooper, Jr
Respondent:
State of South Carolina and Warden Tyger River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. USA
as 3:2023cv00257
Petitioner:
Tony OBrian Davis
Respondent:
USA
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Smith v. Clarke
as 1:2023cv00638
Petitioner:
Tony Smith
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jonah Sovereign v. Harold Clarke
as 23-6381
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONAH JERVAIS SOVEREIGN
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Trustee / Director of DOC / Principal, TONY M. DARDEN, Ancillary Receiver / Agent / Warden, KEVIN MCCOY, Ancillary Receiver / Agent / Warden and others
Simpson v. Youngkin et al
as 3:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Thomas B. Simpson
Defendant:
Glenn Youngkin, Robert Mosier, Jason Miyares and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tony Smith v. Unknown
as 23-6207
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TONY BRYAN SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN
Freeze v. Unknown
as 7:2023cv00090
Plaintiff:
Tony Justin Lee Freeze
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. USA
as 1:2023cv00241
Petitioner:
TONY LEE THOMPSON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Ebersole v. All food service workers, cooks, food preperation pople at Lex County Det Center Et AL
as 0:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
Anthony S. Ebersole, Tony Ebersole and Tony Scott Ebersole
Defendant:
All food service workers, cooks, food preperation people at Lex County Det Center Et Al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
