Cases 61 - 70 of 604
Bell v. State of Maryland
as 1:2022cv00675
Petitioner:
Kent Bell
Defendant:
Warden Gregory A. Werner
Respondent:
State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-6210
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jason Bell v. J. Streeval
as 22-6189
Petitioner / Appellant:
JASON TYWANN BELL
Respondent / Appellee:
J. C. STREEVAL, Warden of USP Lee
Martin et al v. Stowe et al
as 7:2022cv00075
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Martin, J. M. and Christopher James Martin
Defendant:
Heather Stowe, Kathleen Rust Bell and Byron Rashard Britt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saunders v. Bell et al
as 7:2022cv00071
Plaintiff:
Davayon Jerrell Saunders
Defendant:
Sheriff David Bell, Roanoke City Jail Medical Department, Head of Roanoke City Jail Medical Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stricklin v. Bell
as 7:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
Paul Arthur Stricklin, Jr.
Defendant:
Sheriff David K. Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahammend v. Officer Bell et al
as 1:2021cv03153
Plaintiff:
Khalid A Mahammend
Defendant:
Officer Bell, Officer Miles, Officer McGee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Bradley v. Bell et al
as 7:2021cv00615
Plaintiff:
Jerry Orlando Bradley
Defendant:
David Bell, Commanding Officer and Head of Roanoke Sherrif's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00620
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bell v. Onslow County Detention Center et al
as 7:2021cv00195
Plaintiff:
Ronnie L. Bell
Defendant:
Onslow County Detention Center and Onslow County Nursing Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
