Cases 61 - 70 of 769
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plater-Bey v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00844
Plaintiff:
Teon Kendall Plater-Bey
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-6247
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
THOMAS-BEY v. THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2023cv00183
Plaintiff:
ALPHONZA LEONARD PHILLIP THOMAS-BEY
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH-EL BEY v. FLINT et al
as 1:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A. SMITH-EL BEY
Defendant:
BILL FLINT, MS. M. SHEFFIELD, RONNIE FILEDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH-EL BEY v. FLINT et al
as 1:2023cv00148
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A. SMITH-EL BEY
Defendant:
BILL FLINT, RONNIE FIELDS, MS. BONNIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICHARDSON-BEY v. SHELTON et al
as 1:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
LEROY RICHARDSON-BEY
Defendant:
WARDEN M. SHELTON, SGT. WATSON, WARDEN BRAYBOY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00099
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Injunctive/Declaratory Relief
Rankin Bey v. Parks et al
as 5:2023ct03034
Plaintiff:
Napoleon J. Rankin Bey
Defendant:
Lt. Parks, Sgt. Smith, Sgt. Yearger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON-BEY v. ISHEE et al
as 1:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
DARRELL T. ANDERSON-BEY
Defendant:
TODD E. ISHEE and ASSOCIATE WARDEN DEAN LOCKLEAR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
