Cases 61 - 70 of 111
Benavides v. Mitchell et al
as 2:2009cv02798
Petitioner:
Eduardo Benavides
Respondent:
Mary Mitchell and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sturdevant et al v. Holder et al
as 1:2009cv00142
Plaintiff:
Norbert Sturdevant and Jose Ramirez
Defendant:
Eric Holder and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Benavides v. Mitchell et al
as 2:2009cv02468
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Benavides
Defendant:
Mary Mitchell and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Brown v. Stevens et al
as 5:2009hc02120
Petitioner:
Roy Edward Brown
Respondent:
D. Stevens, Kim White and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Robinson v. USP Hazelton et al
as 2:2009cv00102
Petitioner:
Carlose D. Robinson
Respondent:
USP Hazelton , Federal Bureau of Prisons , N. Shultz and others
Cause Of Action: O
Barefoot v. Pettit et al
as 5:2009ct03148
Plaintiff:
Charles Robert Barefoot, Jr.
Defendant:
R. Pettit, J. H. Noray, Mark Mansell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Harris v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2009cv00276
Petitioner:
James Cedric Harris
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley Lappin, Harold Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Anderson v. Stevens et al
as 5:2009hc02049
Petitioner:
Jerry Jerome Anderson
Respondent:
D. Stevens, Kim White and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Harris v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 8:2009cv00895
Petitioner:
James Cedric Harris
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley Lappin, Harold Watts and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00724
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
