Cases 71 - 80 of 90
Clem v. Conners et al
as 7:2012cv00418
Plaintiff:
Jason Clem
Defendant:
J. Conners, Jane Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conner v. USA
as 2:2012cv00026
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Dwayne Jackson Conner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Richie Hansford Conner v. USA
as 5:2012cv80431
Petitioner:
Richie Hansford Conner
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Richard Sisson v. Fred Davi
as 12-6496
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD SISSON
Defendant - Appellee:
FRED DAVIS, Warden, Deerfield Correctional Center, ROSANNE CONNER, RN, Deerfield Correctional Center, K. FAISON, Medical Staff, Deerfield Correctional Center and others
Gary v. McDonnell, etc., et al
as 2:2012cv00099
Plaintiff:
Gregory Tyrone Gary
Defendant:
Robert F. McDonnell, City of Richmond Police, Bryan T. Worwood, City of Richmond Jail Sheriff, Michelle B. Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Rice et al
as 8:2011cv02785
Plaintiff:
Titus Thomas
Defendant:
Ofc. B. Rice, Ofc. M. Davis, Ofc. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Odom v. Injury Negligence Insurance Holder et al
as 3:2011cv01082
Plaintiff:
Christopher Odom
Defendant:
FNU LNU Injury Negligence Insurance Holder, FNU LNU Responsible Authority, FNU Lagud and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sisson v. Davis et al
as 1:2011cv00313
Plaintiff:
Richard Sisson
Defendant:
Fred Davis, Rosanne Conner, K. Faison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Richie Conner
as 11-6153
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RICHIE HANSFORD CONNER
Frierson v. Tripp et al
as 1:2010cv03103
Plaintiff:
Marcus Antonio Frierson
Defendant:
Ofc Tripp, B Haney, Ms Burch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
