Cases 71 - 80 of 107
Henry Martin, Jr. v. William Byars, Jr.
as 13-7326
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENRY W. MARTIN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM ROBERT BYARS, JR., Director, DR. MOORE, Director of Medical Services, DR. T. BYRNE, ACI and others
Defendant:
JAMIE R. WRESSEY, RN Health Care Authority SC Dept of Corrections, DANIEL MURPHY, Department of Corrections Division Inspection SCDC, ALTHEA B. MYERS, Chief Deputy Office of the Investigation & Enforcement and others
Barrett v. Pilkenton et al
as 7:2013cv00021
Plaintiff:
Christopher Adam Barrett
Defendant:
Howard Clark, Major Pickins, SWVRJ-Abingdon Medical Dept. Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Harris et al
as 1:2012cv02704
Plaintiff:
Donnell Smith
Defendant:
Anthony Harris, Karen Blackwell, Reginald Oliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett v. Andrews
as 5:2012hc02171
Petitioner:
Hobart J. Barrett, Jr.
Respondent:
Justin Andrews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Barrett v. Branker et al
as 5:2012ct03120
Plaintiff:
Urel A. Barrett
Defendant:
G.J. Branker, B. Pulley, R. Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Cedric Barrett
as 12-6818
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CEDRIC TYRONE BARRETT
Barrett v. USA
as 4:2012cv00030
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Cedric Tyrone Barrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-7655
Petitioner - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
BARRETT v. USA
as 1:2011cv00821
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
TAUVARIS EUGENE BARRETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Kelvin Canada v. Ricky Fannin
as 11-7212
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KELVIN A. CANADA
Defendant - Appellee:
RICKY FANNIN, Former Correctional Officer at Red Onion State Prison, J. NALE, Officer at Red Onion State Prison, J. BARRETT, Officer at Red Onion State Prison and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.