Cases 71 - 80 of 1,222
Brown v. Bivens et al
as 1:2023cv01498
Plaintiff:
Michael Brown and Michael J. Brown
Defendant:
Bivens, Roxbury C.I. Medical Dept., Carlos Bivens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jowarski Nedd v. Harold Clarke
as 23-6526
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOWARSKI RUSSELL NEDD
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of Virginia Dept of Corrections
Crisano v. Director, Dept. of VA Corrections
as 1:2023cv00664
Petitioner:
Cassie Christine Crisano
Respondent:
Director, Dept. of VA Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02131
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv02131
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Crisano v. Director, Dept. of VA Corrections
as 7:2023cv00279
Petitioner:
Cassie Christine Crisano
Respondent:
Director, Dept. of VA Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01277
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John McKinnon v. Harold Clarke
as 23-6453
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN LAMONT MCKINNON
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE and HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of Virginia Dept. of Corrections
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01172
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davidson v. Mecklenburg County Sheriffs Dept. et al
as 3:2023cv00270
Plaintiff:
Sherrod Davidson
Defendant:
Mecklenburg County Sheriffs Dept. and Gary McFadden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
