Cases 71 - 80 of 95
Eugene Douglas, Jr. v. Gary Maynard
as 12-6440
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EUGENE DOUGLAS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY D. MAYNARD, Secretary, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY & CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, J. MICHAEL STOUFFER, Commissioner and others
Jones v. United States Of America
as 5:2012hc02051
Petitioner:
Harmon Jones
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cline v. Harmon et al
as 5:2011cv00870
Plaintiff:
Phillip Cline
Defendant:
D. J. Harmon, Mike Snow, Mr. Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Frances et al
as 8:2011cv02716
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Williams
Defendant:
PA. Frances, B. Gass, Kathleen Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schwentner v. Maryland Division of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv02704
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Frank Schwentner
Defendant:
Maryland Division of Corrections, J. Michael Stouffer, William Filbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02510
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Maurice Dunbar v. James Mett
as 11-6716
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAURICE DUNBAR
Plaintiff:
REGINALD C. MACK, LLOYD BENNETT, TERENCE HAYES and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES METTS, in charge of Lexington County Detention Center and CITY COUNCIL, or Person Oursee of the Courts
Robert Ellis v. D. Berkebile
as 11-6262
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT K. ELLIS
Defendant - Appellee:
D. BERKEBILE, Warden, DR. HUGHS, Dentist, K. KARL, Dental Assistant, et. al. Beckley FCI and others
Harmon v. Stephens
as 5:2011hc02031
Petitioner:
Michael A. Harmon, Jr.
Respondent:
D.R. Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Douglas v. Maynard et al
as 8:2011cv00255
Plaintiff:
Eugene Douglas, Jr.
Defendant:
Gary D. Maynard, Dept of Public Safety and Correctional Services, J Michael Stouffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
