Cases 81 - 90 of 636
MEYERS v. MCDOWELL
as 1:2022cv01030
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
JOYCE MCDOWELL, P.R.E.A. CORRDINATOR MS. COVINGTON, CHIEF AND SUPERVISOR OF THE PREA OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeil v. Watts et al
as 1:2022cv03053
Plaintiff:
Antwoin McNeil
Defendant:
Gail Watts, Renard Brooks, M. Heinbach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Director Gail Watts et al
as 1:2022cv02746
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Barnes
Defendant:
Director Gail Watts, Officer Gavigin, Officer Agbula and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeovanny Rodriguez-Porras v. Demetrius Clark
as 22-7231
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEOVANNY D. RODRIGUEZ-PORRAS
Defendant / Appellee:
DEMETRIUS A. CLARK, MS. WHITE, NURSE PIEARE and others
Asar v. Barnes
as 6:2022cv03605
Petitioner:
Difankh Asar and James Walter Gist
Respondent:
Nanette Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Draper v. Mailroom Staff et al
as 9:2022cv03543
Plaintiff:
Daniel Draper
Defendant:
Mailroom Staff and Warden A. Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barnes v. Bennett et al
as 1:2022cv02619
Plaintiff:
Juan Barnes
Defendant:
Sgt. Bennett, Lt. Wagner and Lt. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. HAFEEZ et al
as 1:2022cv00829
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
SGT. MR. HAFEEZ, SGT. MR. HUNT, OFFICER MR. BARNES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Craven County et al
as 5:2022ct03360
Plaintiff:
Sharif Hakim Moore
Defendant:
Craven County, Jones County, City of New Bern and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. USA
as 4:2022cv00110
Petitioner:
Justin O'Neal Barnes
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
