Cases 1 - 10 of 503
US v. Arthur Jones
as 24-6462
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ARTHUR F. JONES, a/k/a Arthur Palmer, a/k/a June, a/k/a Junior
Kenneth Creel v. Gary Junker
as 24-6449
Plaintiff:
KENNETH RAY CREEL
Defendant:
GARY JUNKER, DR. ARTHUR CAMPBELL, DEBRA FITZGERALD and others
Arthur Fisher v FNU Whitley, et al
as 6:2024cv01950
Plaintiff:
Arthur Fisher
Defendant:
FNU Whitley and Jeff Hammond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Monroe v. USA
as 3:2024cv00245
Petitioner:
Arthur Lee Monroe, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Venable v. Supreme Court of Virginia et al
as 7:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Demetric Markie Venable
Defendant:
Supreme Court of Virginia, Honorable S. Bernard Goodwyn, Honorable D. Arthur Kelsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arthur v. US Circuit Court
as 1:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
Brent Leland Arthur
Defendant:
US Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Macon v. Stirling et al
as 0:2024cv00185
Petitioner:
Arthur William Macon
Respondent:
Bryan Stirling, South Carolina Department of Corrections and William Langdon, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kleger et al v. Dorchester County, Maryland et al
as 1:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Cindy Kleger and Roger Allan Young
Defendant:
Dorchester County, Maryland, Warden Don Satterfield, Officer Davion Jammal Batson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 d Civil Rights (Death)
Krug v. Clarke et al
as 2:2023cv00678
Plaintiff:
Christopher Brian Krug
Defendant:
Mr. Harold Clarke, Ms. Beth Cabell, Mr. Kemsy Bowles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Peter Buchholtz, Brandeshawn Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
