Cases 1 - 10 of 399
Alston v. Hamilton et al
as 0:2024cv03210
Plaintiff:
Londell Lashun Alston and Londell Alston
Defendant:
Marina Bender Hamilton and Rickey P. Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Johns v. Lauferdie
as 6:2024cv02974
Plaintiff:
Matthew Sanders Johns
Defendant:
FNU Lauferdie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Jeffrey Sanders v. Union County Jail
as 24-6345
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY SANDERS
Defendant:
UNION COUNTY JAIL, DIANE, Head Nurse and JOHN/JANE DOES, All Union County Jail Staff
Sanders v. Falvo
as 4:2024cv01230
Plaintiff:
Damian Vont'a Sanders
Defendant:
Cpl. Officer Falvo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Wright v. Greene et al
as 5:2024ct03060
Plaintiff:
Kayie Shaune Wright
Defendant:
E. Greene, S. Fraser, Sergeant Webster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Little v. South Carolina Dept of Corr Cooperation et al
as 0:2024cv01177
Plaintiff:
David Antonio Little, Jr.
Defendant:
South Carolina Dept. of Corr. Corporation, Kershaw Corr. Inst., Warden James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Londell Alston v. Sanders
as 24-6189
Plaintiff:
LONDELL LASHUN ALSTON
Defendant:
COUNTY OF FAIRFIELD DEPUTY SANDERS, COUNTY OF YORK DEU JOHN DOE #1 and COUNTY OF YORK DEU JOHN DOE #2
Sanders v. Warden, FCI Gilmer
as 3:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Londel Sanders
Defendant:
Warden FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Sanders v. Union County Jail et al
as 3:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Sanders
Defendant:
Union County Jail, Diane LNU and John/Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Warden, FCI Gilmer
as 2:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Londel Sanders
Defendant:
Warden, FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
