Cases 1 - 10 of 92
Nelson v. Roanoke City Jail et al
as 7:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Gregory T. Nelson
Defendant:
Roanoke City Jail, Lt. Earls, Sgt. Donahue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lassiter v. Looney et al
as 7:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Lassiter, Jr.
Defendant:
Sgt. Looney, Lt. Fleming, Irving and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lassiter v. Looney et al
as 2:2023cv00681
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Lassiter, Jr.
Defendant:
Sgt. Looney, LT. Fleming, Irving and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Casey v. Williams et al
as 7:2023cv00587
Plaintiff:
Adam Nicholas Casey
Defendant:
Nancie Williams, Angela M. Moore, Jon Zug and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Galanti v. SWVRJA-Duffield Facility et al
as 7:2023cv00515
Plaintiff:
Christopher Galanti
Defendant:
SWVRJA-Duffield Facility, Wexford Health Services, Dr. Shah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00377
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thacker v. Scott et al
as 7:2023cv00230
Plaintiff:
Justin Alan Thacker
Defendant:
Nurse Scott, Nurse Hale, Nurse Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vonell Davis, Jr. v. Wayne Hill
as 23-6212
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VONELL DAVIS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. WAYNE HILL, MS. MARIA MAXINO-SABUNDAYO, MR. VERNON CROWELL and others
Hale v. Ray
as 3:2023cv00026
Petitioner:
Vance Lamont Hale
Respondent:
H. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
AZAR EL v. HALE et al
as 1:2022cv00998
Petitioner:
RASHAUD HUSSEIN AZAR EL
Respondent:
JAXSON HALE and UNIT MANAGER DENISE JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
