Cases 1 - 10 of 35
v. McNeely et al
as 2:2023cv00489
Respondent:
William Junior McNeely and Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McNeely v. Unknown
as 2:2023cv00477
Petitioner:
William J. McNeely
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anders v. Haug et al
as 7:2023cv00434
Plaintiff:
Jason Anders
Defendant:
Chief Kimberly Haug, Major D. O'Dell, Captain McNeely and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner et al v. Haug et al
as 7:2023cv00322
Plaintiff:
Dereck Ray Turner and Jason Anders
Defendant:
Chief Kimberly Haug, Major D. O'Dell, Captain McNealy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Epps v. Anderson County Sheriff's Office et al
as 8:2022cv00934
Plaintiff:
Paula Epps
Defendant:
Anderson County Sheriff's Office and Daniel McNeely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
James Rose, Jr. v. State of South Carolina
as 22-6218
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES EDWARD ROSE, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, BERKELEY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, HILL-FINKLEA DETENTION CENTER and others
Rose v. State of South Carolina et al
as 2:2021cv02909
Plaintiff:
James Edward Rose, Jr
Defendant:
State of South Carolina, Berkeley County Sheriff's Office, Hill-Finklea Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinton et al v. Cooper et al
as 5:2021ct03021
Plaintiff:
Michael Collins Wilson, Byron McNeely, Kenneth Leonard Dunbar and others
Defendant:
Roy Cooper, John Herring, Erik A. Hooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCNEELY v. USA
as 1:2021cv00010
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
JOSHUA ALAN MCNEELY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
MCNEELY v. USA
as 1:2020cv00935
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
JOSHUA ALAN MCNEELY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
