Cases 1 - 10 of 1,972
Lorence Smith, II v. Warden
as 24-6552
Petitioner:
LORENCE F. SMITH, II
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI Bennettsville
Martin v. Taylor et al
as 1:2024cv01634
Plaintiff:
Michael Martin
Defendant:
Exec. Dir. F. Todd Taylor, Jr, Dept. Dir. Robin Woolford, Warden Jeff Nines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Rosch et al
as 2:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Kyle Rosch, Chadwick Dotson, S. Soloman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler et al v. Dash
as 5:2024cv03188
Plaintiff:
Phillip Mitchell Butler and Charles Gene Butler
Defendant:
Judge Derrick F. Dash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
El-Bey v. Logsdon et al
as 1:2024cv01505
Plaintiff:
Bro Stephen Michael El-Bey
Defendant:
William Logsdon, F. Farinloye, Ndze and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Franklin et al
as 5:2024ct03128
Plaintiff:
David Henderson
Defendant:
Allison Franklin, Bryan Nelson, N. Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Arthur Jones
as 24-6462
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ARTHUR F. JONES, a/k/a Arthur Palmer, a/k/a June, a/k/a Junior
Butler et al v. Sergeant Kathyn M. Platt et al
as 5:2024cv02848
Defendant:
Sergeant Kathyn M. Platt, Katlyn M Platt, CA Burns and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip Mitchell Butler and Charles Gene Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Deegan v. Hutcheson et al
as 7:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Michael John Deegan
Defendant:
Bryan F. Hutcheson, Michelle Woods, Alicia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
El-Bey v. Logsdon et al
as 1:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
Bro Stephen Michael El-Bey
Defendant:
William Logsdon, F. Farinloye, NDZE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
