Cases 1 - 10 of 480
McClain v. Baker et al
as 0:2024cv03329
Plaintiff:
Johnny I. McClain, III
Defendant:
Andy Baker, Y.C.D.C. Officer and Mrs. Huffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Huffman v. Baker
as 7:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Jullian Huffman
Defendant:
Judge Thomas W. Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huffman v. Baker
as 7:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
Jullian Andrew Huffman
Defendant:
Judge Thomas W. Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. USA
as 2:2024cv00309
Petitioner:
Andre Maurice Baker
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Baker v. Lovett
as 3:2024cv00038
Petitioner:
Samuel Baker
Respondent:
Warden Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
BAKER v. USA
as 1:2024cv00283
Petitioner:
JULIUS WAYNE BAKER
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
M.L. et al v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
M.L., E.W. and S.W.
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Colette Peters, Christopher Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Branch v. Anderson County Detention Center et al
as 2:2024cv00851
Plaintiff:
Michael James Branch and Michael James Branch, Sr.
Defendant:
Anderson County Detention Center, A.C.D.C. Medical Provider Staff, Chad McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McDuffie v. Baker et al
as 5:2024ct03042
Plaintiff:
Prentis McDuffie
Defendant:
Matthew Baker and Russell Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richey v. McBride et al
as 6:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jerry Richey
Defendant:
Sheriff Chad McBride, Captain David Baker, Lieutenant Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
