Cases 1 - 10 of 3,218
Corvin Young v. Spartanburg County Detention Facility
as 24-6595
Plaintiff:
CORVIN J. YOUNG
Defendant:
SPARTANBURG COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY, SPARTANBURG COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA, SHERIFF CHUCK WRIGHT, County Sheriff and others
Diondre Jones v. Correctional Officer Appenheimer
as 24-6576
Plaintiff:
DIONDRE KE-SEAN JONES
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER APPENHEIMER
Jones v. North Branch Correctional Institution
as 1:2024cv01645
Plaintiff:
Joshua Colonna Jones, Joshua Jones and Joshua C. Jones
Defendant:
North Branch Correctional Institution and Western Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughter v. Vaughn et al
as 2:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
James R. Vaughter
Defendant:
Lt. R. Vaughn, Sgt. Andrews, Ofc. Mobley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Locklear
as 5:2024hc02110
Petitioner:
Michael Contrez Jones
Respondent:
Warden Mary Locklear
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Albert Anderson v. Foothills Correctional Institution
as 24-6557
Plaintiff:
ALBERT ANDERSON
Defendant:
FOOTHILLS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, HUDGINS, Sergeant, MOTLEY, Correctional Officer and others
Jones v. Ishee
as 5:2024hc02107
Petitioner:
Rodney Moucell Jones
Respondent:
Todd E. Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Director Department Corrections
as 1:2024cv00976
Petitioner:
Herbert William Jones, Jr.
Respondent:
Director Department Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROOKS v. RICKER et al
as 1:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
RASHAWN A. BROOKS
Defendant:
OFFICER RICKER, OFFICER JONES, OFFICER SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Rosch et al
as 2:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Kyle Rosch, Chadwick Dotson, S. Soloman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
