Cases 1 - 10 of 1,510
Loren et al v. Jackson et al
as 5:2024ct03225
Plaintiff:
Webster R. Neumann, Bobby Reece, Roger W. Clark and others
Defendant:
Haley Phillips, Darren Jackson, Graham Atkinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. USA
as 6:2024cv04789
Petitioner:
Antonio Marques Dominique Jackson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Jackson v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00477
Petitioner:
Anita Louise Jackson
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jackson v. USA
as 3:2024cv00789
Petitioner:
Walter Bavon Jackson
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Conyers v. Jackson
as 6:2024cv04569
Respondent:
Shane Jackson
Petitioner:
King Chevais Conyers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John Anthony Williams v. Alonzo Thompson
as 24-6769
Defendant:
UNKNOWN NAMED AGENTS OF GBI, Georgia Bureau Investigation, SHERIFF CHUCK WRIGHT, UNKNOWN NAME AGENTS OF SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES PHONE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN ANTHONY MICHAEL WILLIAMS
Jackson v. USA
as 3:2024cv00738
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Walter Bavon Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Jackson v. Sumter County Sheriffs Office Detention Center et al
as 0:2024cv04364
Plaintiff:
Jerrimire Jackson
Defendant:
Anthony Dennis, Sumter County Sheriffs Office Detention Center and Officer McCray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Osha Johnson v. Marquita McCullough
as 24-6757
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT MCKISSACK, WARDEN JACKSON, LIEUTENANT ROBINSON and others
Plaintiff:
OSHA A. JOHNSON
Kinloch v. Phillips et al
as 5:2024cv04305
Defendant:
Shane Jackson, Counts and Phillips
Plaintiff:
Marquise Kinloch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
